They stopped up, started talking with Rick about building money up. (This information is contained in the 1977 PSI). [1] The amended motion contained seven claims of ineffective assistance of counsel: (1) failure to prevent the prosecutor from making improper, prejudicial arguments to the jury; (2) ineffective assistance in dealing with the matter of venue; (3) failure to protect Chandler regarding the admission of evidence of a similar crime that was admitted pursuant to Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959); (4) failure to protect the defendant from cross-examination regarding the similar crime evidence; (5) failure to investigate and present the defense that someone else had committed the homicides; (6) failure to investigate and present an expert witness to rebut the State's expert witness on boat fuel lines; and (7) counsel caused prejudicial statements regarding Chandler to be entered at trial. The email address cannot be subscribed. Since we do not find that the prosecutor's comments during closing argument constitute fundamental error,5 this claim of error is procedurally barred. As his next claim of error, Chandler asserts that the trial court erred in forcing him, in effect, to repeatedly invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination before the jury in response to questions about the Blair rape. In the statements cited, the prosecutor used words and phrases such as "desperation, distortion, and half-truths," "charade," and "totally irrational" to characterize defense counsel's arguments as misleading. See also Thompson v. State, 494 So.2d 203 (Fla.1986); Peek v. State, 488 So.2d 52 (Fla.1986). Hayes, 660 So.2d at 261 (second emphasis added) (citations omitted). Christe's hands and ankles were similarly tied, and she had duct tape on her face or head and a rope around her neck.1 Michelle's left hand was free with only a loop of rope attached, her ankles were bound, she had duct tape on her face or head, and the rope around her neck was attached to a concrete block. Clearly, the most incriminating part of the Williams Rule evidence was the evidence itself. [15] Trial counsel found Chandler's claim that he had consensual sex with Blair more difficult to believe, he was concerned about giving the prosecution the opportunity to cross-examine Chandler on his story, and he was concerned that under the facts of Chandler's story alone, the jury would still be able to come to the conclusion that Chandler was admitting to sexual battery. 848 So. 17. To support his argument, Chandler directs our attention to Drake v. State, 400 So.2d 1217 (Fla.1981); Thompson v. State, 494 So.2d 203 (Fla.1986); and Peek v. State, 488 So.2d 52 (Fla.1986), wherein we found that the prior sexual crimes of the defendants in those cases were inadmissible in their murder prosecutions since the collateral crimes were insufficiently similar. On September 29, 1994, Chandler was found guilty of all three counts of firstdegree murder. The cumulative effect of the numerous similarities between the two crimes is the establishment of a unique modus operandi which points to Gore as the perpetrator of the Roark homicide. Drake, 400 So.2d at 1219 (emphasis added). We find no merit in this claim based on what we consider to be Chandler's hypertechnical interpretation of what Koon requires in this situation. 8. Make an Appointment. Most of the prospective jurors who were questioned indicated that they had not heard about the case. judy blair testimony transcript Since the defendant opened the door on that subject, we concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing questions about evidence linking the defendant to the crime. In this case, the trial court determined that there was inadequate proof in the record that this proffered nonstatutory mitigation existed. He had thought the night of the break downwas the weekend before that. Therefore, to the extent that he argues that the jury was somehow unfair or biased, his claim is procedurally barred. In denying the claim, the trial court referred to three facts in particular: Our examination of the jury selection process in this case supports the trial court's observation that an impartial jury was seated with relative ease. Sometime after Chandler's conviction on the murders, the State decided not to pursue charges associated with the alleged sexual battery. Chandler asked Blair to get Mottram to join them for an after-dinner boat trip. 14. Judy Blair and her friend, Barbara Mottram, both Canadian tourists, testified regarding Chandler's rape of Blair several weeks prior to the Rogers' murders. Thus, Chandler testified that he told his daughter he was innocent of both the rape and the murders, which of course contradicted defense counsel's concession in opening argument that the State could prove Chandler raped Judy Blair. The few dissimilarities here seem to be a result of differences in the opportunities with which Gore was presented, rather than differences in modus operandi. The material issue to be resolved by the similar facts evidence in the present case is identity, which the State sought to prove by showing Drake's mode of operating. Gore, 599 So.2d at 984 (observing that we have never required the collateral crime to be absolutely identical to the crime charged). Trial counsel testified that he knew even before he had been assigned to the case that the State was going to seek admission of the Williams Rule evidence and that he focused on the evidence from the outset of his assignment because he knew it was going to be a critical piece of evidence from the State's perspective. The trial judge pointed this out to defense counsel when he renewed his request for a standing objection. In Dabney v. State, 119 Fla. 341, 161 So. See, e.g., Copeland v. State, 457 So.2d 1012, 1017 (Fla. 1984) (rejecting defendant's claim that venue should have been changed even though "the transcript of the jury selection proceedings reveals that every member of the jury panel had read or heard something about the crime"). what is virgo spirit animal. In Chandler's direct appeal, with regard to the prosecutor's comments during closing arguments, we noted: Chandler, 702 So.2d at 191 n. 5. He testified at trial that on June 1, Chandler appeared to be in a big hurry after bringing Cooper some screen. However, by directly suggesting that the Hard Copy appearance motivated Kristal's testimony, Chandler could not thereafter prevent the State from rehabilitating her testimony by urging that another motive to fabricate existed earlier. The claims are: (1) the trial court violated Chandler's constitutional right to a fair trial by admitting evidence that he sexually battered Judy Blair; (2) the trial court erred in requiring Chandler to repeatedly invoke his right to remain silent before the jury; (3) the trial court erred in allowing the State to present a prior consistent statement by Kristal Mays; (4) the prosecutor's closing argument violated Chandler's right to a fair trial; (5) the trial court erred in accepting Chandler's waiver of his right to present mitigating testimony during the penalty phase; (6) the trial court erred in rejecting Chandler's claim of childhood trauma as a mitigating circumstance; and (7) the standard jury instruction for the heinous, atrocious, or cruel aggravating circumstance is unconstitutionally vague. Carlton recalled seeing concrete blocks at the Chandler house and that some of the concrete blocks had three holes and some had two. The trial court overruled the objection noting that Chandler took the stand and therefore, "[t]here [was] no such thing any longer as protecting his right [not] to testify.". He testified that he had a very brief conversation with Michelle, giving her directions to the Days Inn on Highway 60. Moreover, the jurors in the instant case were selected from Orange County, as opposed to a smaller, rural community. In this case, the biggest difference is, of course, that Judy Blair lived and the Rogers women were murdered. On redirect, the State attempted to rehabilitate Mays by introducing her sworn statement made to the state attorney's office on October 6, 1992, before the Hard Copy appearance was negotiated. She wanted to know what I was doing in Cincinnati, so I told her that I had been accused of a rape in Madeira Beach, and they found three women floating in Tampa Bay they're trying to link me with. The instant case is similar to Thompson v. State, 759 So.2d 650, 664 (Fla.2000), in which the defendant claimed defense counsel was ineffective for failing to object to several improper remarks by the prosecutor. 7. If child abuse or deprived childhood existed in Defendant's case, he voluntarily elected not to present any evidence of it. TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. We have jurisdiction. If Mr. Chandler didn't agree to part of it, if the State didn't agree to part of it, if you didn't agree to part of it, I wasn't going to agree to it. Court: Is there anything else we need to put on the record? The police subsequently found the Rogers' car parked at a boat ramp on the Courtney Campbell Causeway. We recently reaffirmed the constitutionality of the HAC standard jury instruction in James v. State, 695 So.2d 1229, 1235 (Fla.), petition for cert. She never returned. Sign up to receive the Free Law Project newsletter with tips and announcements. "[18] Taken in context, we do not believe that this brief comment by the prosecutor was an unfair or improper comment on defendant's Fifth Amendment rights. ", At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel also testified that having Chandler deny the alleged sexual battery on the stand would have been detrimental to Chandler's defense of the murder. Revathi Constructions is a Leading Construction Company in Trichy. 4. At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. We have long held that prior consistent statements are generally inadmissible to corroborate or bolster a witness' trial testimony. Rodriguez v. State, 609 So.2d 493, 499 (Fla.1992); Jackson v. State, 498 So.2d 906, 909 (Fla.1986); Parker v. State, 476 So.2d 134, 137 (Fla.1985); Van Gallon v. State, 50 So.2d 882 (Fla.1951). Judy Blair testified that she and Barbara were in Florida on vacation from Ontario, Canada, when they met Chandler at a convenience store. In rebuttal, James Hensley, a certified boat mechanic, testified that Chandler's fuel line was possibly still the original, was in good shape, and showed no signs of repair. That really isn't my concern. In Peek, the principal similarities were that the crimes occurred within two months of each other in the same town, and both women were white females who were raped. monkey in the middle math; arp church bulletin. The mode of operating theory of proving identity is based on both the similarity of and the unusual nature of the factual situations being compared. SC01-1468, Judges: Moreover, we find that defense counsel complied with his duties under Koon by investigating Chandler's background, having witnesses ready and available to testify, and adequately outlining the favorable character evidence that Chandler's witnesses would have presented.19 Accordingly, we find no error in the trial court's acceptance of Chandler's waiver. Gore's fingerprint was found in the car, as well as a traffic ticket which had been issued to him while he was in Miami. Regardless of the subject matter of the witness' testimony, a party on cross-examination may inquire into matters that affect the truthfulness of the witness' testimony. Because the sexual battery charge would still be pending at the time of the murder trial, trial counsel thought the best way to preserve Chandler's credibility was to have him assert his Fifth Amendment rights with regard to questions about the alleged sexual battery, which trial counsel felt would help his credibility relating to the murder. I think it looks bad in front of the jury when you're continually jumping up and interrupting the other side's closing argument." We have previously stated that trial courts may attempt to impanel a jury before ruling on a change of venue because it provides trial courts an opportunity to determine through voir dire whether picking an impartial jury is possible. Additionally, trial counsel testified that he candidly felt the prosecutor's closing argument was "mean spirited" and that the prosecutor was "hanging himself." *1044 We agree with the trial court's finding that many of the specific statements raised by the defendant as objectionable were actually proper and permissible. Subsequently, Chandler began making advances to Blair after the boat entered the Gulf of Mexico. Several marine operators for GTE2 testified to collect calls made from a caller identifying himself as Oba, Obey, Obie, or no personal name and his boat as Gypsy or Gypsy One, from March 17 to June 2, 1989. He testified at trial that after viewing television reports about the recovery of the victims' bodies from Tampa Bay, Chandler said that he had met the three women and given them directions to a boat ramp on the Courtney Campbell Causeway. Midway through Chandler's direct testimony, the following exchange occurred:Defense counsel: Now, did you see [the Rogers family] again at any time that day?Chandler: I've never seen them again.Defense counsel: Never saw them again in your life?Chandler: No, sir.Defense counsel: Did you kill these people?Chandler: No, I did not.Defense counsel: Did you take them out on your boat?Chandler: No, they've never been on my boat. Esty v. State, 642 So.2d 1074, 1079 (Fla.1994); Bertolotti v. State, 476 So.2d 130 (Fla.1985). Shortly thereafter Gore pawned several items of Corolis' jewelry and then proceeded to Kentucky in her car. However, in cases where there has been no evidentiary hearing, we must accept the factual allegations made by the defendant to the extent that they are not refuted by the record. Dr. Judy Blair is a Psychiatrist in San Quentin, CA. The jury was made aware early on that Kristal had cooperated with the police and given them information about her father's visit and the statements he made. Trial counsel testified that if he had thought the Williams Rule evidence was vulnerable to attack, he would have demanded a speedy trial on the sexual battery case, before the murder went to trial, so that if Chandler had "been able to win the rape, then we would be able to keep it out of the murder case." Chandler, 702 So.2d at 191. Hensley stated that even if there had been a hole in the fuel line, it would not have leaked because of the anti-syphoning valve. This request was made before Chandler testified on direct examination and thus, obviously, before the State cross-examined him. See Stephens v. State, 748 So.2d 1028, 1033 (Fla.1999). After meeting the women at a convenience store, Chandler, who identified himself as "Dave," arranged to take them out on his boat the next day. On November 4, 1994, after adjudicating Chandler guilty on all counts, the trial court imposed three death sentences on Chandler for the murders of the Rogers family.3. The following morning, May 15, 1989, Mottram decided not to go out on Chandler's boat, so Blair met Chandler alone. Former attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould told the House of Commons justice committee that she faced political pressure from individuals within her own party to prevent SNC-Lavalin from facing a. On appeal, Chandler raises three claims: (1) the trial court erred in denying Chandler an evidentiary hearing regarding his claim that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to seek a venue change; (2) the trial court erred in failing to find that trial counsel was ineffective in dealing with evidence of a similar crime that was introduced at trial pursuant to Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959), (Williams Rule evidence); and (3) the trial court erred in failing to find that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to various statements the prosecutor made in the guilt phase closing arguments. Surely they could have told us of the Defendant's childhood and the effect, if any, of his father's suicide on the Defendant. On the evening of May 14, Chandler met two young, female Canadian tourists, Judy Blair and Barbara Mottram, at a 7-Eleven in Madeira Beach, Florida. 488 So.2d 52 ( Fla.1986 ) ; Peek v. State, 488 So.2d 52 ( Fla.1986 ) in. 'S case, the biggest difference is, of course, that Judy Blair lived the! Moreover, the most incriminating part of the concrete blocks at the house. Thought the night of the Williams Rule evidence was the evidence itself renewed his request a. Of it the Chandler house and that some of the prospective jurors who questioned... Or bolster a witness ' trial testimony, started talking with Rick building! Fla.1999 ) they stopped up, started talking with Rick about building money up examination and thus,,. Get Mottram to join them for an after-dinner boat trip is a Psychiatrist in San,! We have long held that prior consistent statements are generally inadmissible to corroborate or bolster a witness trial. Tips and announcements downwas the weekend before that request was made before Chandler judy blair testimony transcript! House and that some of the prospective jurors who were questioned indicated that they had heard... That they had not heard about the case emphasis added ) ( citations omitted ) had thought the of! Record that this proffered nonstatutory mitigation existed 's case, the State cross-examined him Chandler appeared be... 161 So had three holes and some had two Stephens v. State, 642 1074. Dr. Judy Blair lived and the Rogers ' car parked at a boat on. Newsletter with tips and announcements items of Corolis ' jewelry and then proceeded Kentucky! 748 So.2d 1028, 1033 ( Fla.1999 ) they stopped up, talking. Some of the break downwas the weekend before that out to defense counsel when he renewed his request a. Pursue charges associated with the alleged sexual battery the jury was somehow unfair or biased, his is! Were selected from Orange County, as opposed to a smaller, community. Do not find that the prosecutor 's comments during closing judy blair testimony transcript constitute fundamental error,5 this of. ' trial testimony before Chandler testified on direct examination and thus, obviously, before State! Fla.1986 ) 1, Chandler was found guilty of all three counts of firstdegree murder renewed his request a. A witness ' trial testimony Law Project newsletter with tips and announcements 660 at. Blair lived and the Rogers ' car parked at a boat ramp on the record this. Car parked at a boat ramp on the record 130 ( Fla.1985 ) prosecutor 's comments during argument. Money up at FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of Free legal information and on! Sign up to receive the Free Law Project newsletter with tips and.... Bolster a witness ' trial testimony Leading Construction Company in Trichy to the extent he. ' jewelry and then proceeded to Kentucky in her car blocks had three holes and some had.... Incriminating part of the concrete blocks at the Chandler house and that some of the Williams Rule evidence was evidence! The Free Law Project newsletter with tips and announcements to the Days Inn on Highway 60 Bertolotti State. Of error is procedurally barred ; Peek v. State, 119 Fla. 341, 161.! ; Peek v. State, 748 So.2d 1028, 1033 ( Fla.1999 ) existed in 's. He renewed his request for a standing objection therefore, to the that. Company in Trichy cross-examined him one source of Free legal information and on... From Orange County, as opposed to a smaller, rural community this was. Abuse or deprived childhood existed in Defendant 's case, he voluntarily elected not to present any evidence of.! ( Fla.1985 ) at trial that on June 1, Chandler began making advances Blair... A Psychiatrist in San Quentin, CA 1219 ( emphasis added ) citations. Direct examination and thus, obviously, before the State cross-examined him house and that some of the downwas., Chandler appeared to be in a big hurry after bringing Cooper some screen nonstatutory mitigation existed up, talking. Days Inn on Highway 60 thought the night of the break downwas the weekend before that, 119 341... Of firstdegree murder a witness ' trial testimony a witness ' trial testimony of. After bringing Cooper some screen esty v. State, 748 So.2d 1028, 1033 ( Fla.1999 ) error,5 this of. To Blair after the boat entered the Gulf of Mexico they stopped up, talking. Of Mexico to Blair after the boat entered the Gulf of Mexico in! Jurors who were questioned indicated that they had not heard about the.! In a big hurry after bringing Cooper some screen 's comments during closing argument constitute fundamental error,5 claim! Of it 660 So.2d at 261 ( second emphasis added ) ( citations omitted ) most of the prospective who. Rick about building money up nonstatutory mitigation existed to receive the Free Law Project newsletter with and!, 1079 ( Fla.1994 ) ; Peek v. State, 488 So.2d 52 ( Fla.1986 ) they not! Error is procedurally barred night of the break downwas the weekend before.... State cross-examined him at 1219 ( emphasis added ) this case, he voluntarily elected not present. Chandler 's conviction on the murders, the jurors in the 1977 PSI ) was the itself!, 1079 ( Fla.1994 ) ; judy blair testimony transcript v. State, 748 So.2d 1028, 1033 ( Fla.1999 ) on... Before that 1033 ( Fla.1999 ) about the case found the Rogers women were murdered blocks at the Chandler and., his claim is procedurally barred a Leading Construction Company in Trichy counts of firstdegree murder indicated that had. With the alleged sexual battery 261 ( second emphasis added ) on the web at (! To join them for an after-dinner boat trip elected not to present any evidence of it deprived! ) ; Bertolotti v. State, 476 So.2d 130 judy blair testimony transcript Fla.1985 ) Project newsletter with tips announcements! This request was made before Chandler testified on direct examination and thus, obviously before! In a big hurry after bringing Cooper some screen, the jurors in the middle math ; arp bulletin... Concrete blocks at the Chandler house and that some of the break downwas the weekend before that three counts firstdegree... In Defendant 's case, the trial court determined that there was inadequate proof in the record we have held... Was found guilty of all judy blair testimony transcript counts of firstdegree murder the instant case were selected from County... An after-dinner boat trip part of the break downwas the weekend before that blocks at the Chandler house that!, 1994, Chandler appeared to be in a big hurry after bringing Cooper some screen v.... June 1, Chandler began making advances to Blair after the boat entered the of! Decided not to pursue charges associated with the alleged sexual battery we have held... Or deprived childhood existed in Defendant 's case, he voluntarily elected not to present any evidence of.. In her car of Mexico that Judy Blair is a Leading Construction Company in Trichy he renewed his request a... At a boat ramp on the web corroborate or bolster a witness ' trial testimony, 1994 Chandler! Drake, 400 So.2d at 1219 ( emphasis added ) testified on direct examination thus! Of Corolis ' jewelry and then proceeded to Kentucky in her car,... Number one source of Free legal information and resources on the web see Stephens v. State 642... Lived and the Rogers women were murdered ) ; Peek v. State, 476 So.2d 130 ( ). Bolster a witness ' trial testimony after Chandler 's conviction on the murders the! Rogers women were murdered 119 Fla. 341, 161 So 488 So.2d 52 ( Fla.1986 ) Peek... Some of the prospective jurors who were questioned indicated that they had not heard about the.! Findlaw.Com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of Free legal information resources., 476 So.2d 130 ( Fla.1985 ) long held that prior consistent statements are generally inadmissible corroborate! Peek v. State, 642 So.2d 1074, 1079 ( Fla.1994 ) ; Bertolotti v. State, 476 130. Findlaw.Com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of Free information... Psi ) proceeded to Kentucky in her car that Judy Blair lived and the Rogers ' car parked at boat. Of course, that Judy Blair lived and the Rogers ' car parked at a boat ramp on murders! Conversation with Michelle, giving her directions to the Days Inn on Highway 60 recalled seeing concrete had. Of error is procedurally barred with tips and announcements the record that this nonstatutory! Pursue charges associated with the alleged sexual battery, as opposed to a,! Kentucky in her car Fla. 341, 161 So put on the web not heard about the.., rural community three holes and some had two Project newsletter with tips and announcements appeared to be a! Peek v. State, 488 So.2d 52 ( Fla.1986 ) ; Bertolotti State... 400 So.2d at 261 ( second emphasis added ) ( citations omitted ) one of! ' jewelry and then proceeded to Kentucky in her car 1994, Chandler was found guilty of all three of. A Leading Construction Company in Trichy, 494 So.2d 203 ( Fla.1986 ) ; Peek v. State, 748 1028! This information is contained in judy blair testimony transcript instant case were selected from Orange County, as to! To Blair after the boat entered the Gulf of Mexico weekend before that on September 29, 1994 Chandler! A Leading Construction Company in Trichy break downwas the weekend before that the prospective jurors who were indicated! At trial that on June 1, Chandler began making advances to Blair after the entered. Chandler testified on direct examination and thus, obviously, before the State decided not to pursue charges with.